Our Mission
Reduce the cost of careful legal review
M&A transactions deserve thorough document review. The bottleneck has always been time and attorney cost, not the willingness to do the work. Statuteharbor removes that bottleneck at the clause-analysis step, the part that scales poorly with human hours.
The Team
Built by practitioners, for practitioners
The founding team brings together transactional legal experience and document intelligence engineering. No M&A reviewer is an outsider here.
Spent years in corporate transactional practice reading the same clause categories Statuteharbor now flags: indemnity caps, change-of-control triggers, survival windows. The observation was not that the work was too hard, but that the structured-read portion of it was consuming attorney time that should have been spent on judgment calls. That gap is what Statuteharbor was built to close.
Background building document intelligence and NLP systems for professional contexts where a missed flag has real consequences. Engineered Statuteharbor's clause extraction and cross-reference resolution pipeline. His design constraint from the start: flag accuracy at the individual provision level, not aggregate performance across document types.
Background in contract workflow and due diligence process design from transactional practice. Sits between what the platform produces and what practicing attorneys need it to produce. Owns the feedback loop between pilot users and the clause taxonomy, which is where flag quality is either earned or lost.
Founding Story
Why M&A document review specifically
In 2024, after years in corporate transactional practice, Margaret Sullivan started mapping the specific bottleneck. A first-pass review of a 200-page SPA involves reading the document carefully, identifying high-risk provisions across six or seven clause categories, and preparing a summary for the deal team. The task is time-consuming not because attorneys work slowly but because the agreement structure is genuinely complex and the flagging requires clause-level judgment.
The founding insight was narrow: AI cannot replace that judgment, but it can handle the structured-read portion that precedes it. Parsing the clause taxonomy, following cross-references to definitions, identifying which provisions meet the flag threshold. That step is repeatable in a way the judgment step is not.
Statuteharbor starts with M&A purchase agreements because the clause categories are well-defined, the stakes are high, and the market-practice benchmarks exist. A tool that tries to cover every contract type at once ends up covering none of them with the precision that matters when a deal is on the table.
See how it works
Work with us
Interested in the early-access program?
We are working with a selected group of M&A practices during the pilot phase. We welcome legal teams who want to bring structured first-pass review into their workflow.